Class collaboration 
between the Egyptian military junta and their neo-political allies, the 
Muslim Brotherhood, now confront the people standing for democracy. One 
year ago, the matrix of collusion was not evident to many. One year ago,
 the actors on the Egyptian political stage had different robes. 
Mass protests for 18 days in the most populous Arab 
country brought Mubarak’s three decades of autocratic rule to its end on
 Feb. 11, 2011. To many, it was part of a spring sweeping the Arab 
jaahaan. But in countries of the region, it turned a cold, reactionary 
winter.
With a new ruling class alliance and deployed extra 
soldiers and tanks by the generals Egypt now is fomenting with protests.
 On the opposite, there are plans for waves of strikes aimed at forcing 
out the generals from power. The generals’ council, the protesting 
forces claim, stands opposite to democracy, social justice and 
individual freedoms. The planned strikes show confronting position of 
liberal and leftist social forces and the alliance of the generals, 
Islamist politicians and religious leaders. The strike planners say: The
 “people must show duty to the nation and spare its tattered economy 
fresh damage.” On the contrary, the religious authorities have called on
 to scrap the planned strike. The first strike planned from Saturday, 
Mubarak’s overthrow anniversary, would close universities and factories,
 cancel trains and stop public services. A statement by 39 youth groups 
said: “The strike is just a beginning to carry the revolutionary battle 
forward, to link political and democratic demands with social and 
economic ones.” The Muslim Brotherhood has refused to back the strike. 
Mahmoud Hussein, general secretary of the MB, said in a statement: “This
 call is very dangerous […]” 
“I appeal to you”, Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayyeb, Grand 
Imam of Egypt’s highest Islamic authority Al-Azhar, said in a message, 
“not to disrupt work even for one hour.” “Civil disobedience”, Coptic 
Orthodox Pope Shenouda III said in a statement, “is not accepted by 
religion and the state does not accept it and there are many verses in 
the Holy Book that talk of following the ruler.”
Protest and violence regularly overshadow Egypt. 
Last December experienced protests as military police assaulted 
demonstrators challenging military rule, and in turn, protesters hurled 
Molotov cocktails at the parliament building. There was violence around 
ballot-counting that compelled hundreds of judges monitoring the 
parliamentary elections to announce threat to quit over.
The parliament is acting as subordinate to generals,
 employees on the payroll of people. The legislature now holds a 
promissory note given by the generals to turn over power to the people, 
the generals’ employer, by the end of June 2012, after the ratification 
of a new constitution and the election of a president. There are basic 
and burning problems in today’s Egypt. 
The hulking problems 
Dire economic reality with springing up frustrations over poverty overwhelms every aspect of life in the country. Inflation climbed to 9% in November, a 2% rise over the previous month. Food and beverages prices jumped further. With spiraling prices of staples the rising living cost comes as an increasing number of people are struggling to find work. Foreign exchange reserves have fallen down to around $18 billion in January from $36 billion. There is a drop in state income. The tourism industry, one of main sources of revenue generating about 10% of GDP, has taken a downturn with revenue for the year stood at $8.8 billion. In 2010, it was $12.5 billion. Standard and Poor’s has downgraded the country’s creditworthiness to B+, four levels below investment grade. This will increase borrowing costs. (Oxford Business Group, “Egypt: Facing economic challenges”, Jan. 30, 2012)
Dire economic reality with springing up frustrations over poverty overwhelms every aspect of life in the country. Inflation climbed to 9% in November, a 2% rise over the previous month. Food and beverages prices jumped further. With spiraling prices of staples the rising living cost comes as an increasing number of people are struggling to find work. Foreign exchange reserves have fallen down to around $18 billion in January from $36 billion. There is a drop in state income. The tourism industry, one of main sources of revenue generating about 10% of GDP, has taken a downturn with revenue for the year stood at $8.8 billion. In 2010, it was $12.5 billion. Standard and Poor’s has downgraded the country’s creditworthiness to B+, four levels below investment grade. This will increase borrowing costs. (Oxford Business Group, “Egypt: Facing economic challenges”, Jan. 30, 2012)
A stagnating economic growth under the shadow of a 
financial crisis and virtually dried up foreign investment have coupled 
with an annoying 12% official unemployment rate. The youth unemployment 
rate is at least double that official figure. Heavily pressurized 
exchange rate for the currency and mounting debts has increased the 
worrying load. A further devaluation will increase food prices 
stimulating already smoldering grievances. The legion of jobless and 
underemployed reinvigorates legitimate grievances that can renew social 
unrest. The government has announced plans to cut down about $4 billion 
from the deficit of more than $30 billion. Energy subsidy is being cut 
as negotiations with the IMF over the terms of a $3.2 billion loan have 
been reopened.
The great divide – the rich-poor – is there. Intact 
is the illogical distribution system that feeds and fattens only the 
rich, who are also powerful. The new masters at the helms will not 
address these problems. Their class interest can’t allow them to move 
into that territory.
The volte-face
The Muslim Brotherhood, the ruling class alliance 
component, after denouncing Western colonialism for decades, now 
supports free markets, an inefficient, undemocratic tool in efficient 
hands of capital to hook people. The political actor also feels the 
urgency of subsidy reform, and is befriending the IMF. Now, the MB is 
also having an understanding with the Empire, its old arch enemy. 
Political alignments for unhindered raging of neo-liberal compact are 
thus being ensured. Wealth distribution question is being ignored. 
The standard bearers of “democracy” and the generals
 have united in a compromise on a legal system no more Islamic than the 
earlier one. The compromise is assuring for major internal and external 
stakeholders in Egypt. The MB and the military negotiated, and the MB is
 finding out ways to help the generals to exit with immunity.
In November, the MB was assuring public that they would challenge the military over its right to continue appointing the prime minister and the cabinet until a constitution is ratified and a president is elected. Weeks later, the great giver of assurance said it would leave the military-appointed government until June. A number of MB leaders said the constitution should be drafted on the military’s preferred timetable, before the election of a president. Till then, the generals will retain control of the government. “We will cooperate with everyone, the people, the Parliament, the cabinet and military council”, Essam el-Erian, a MB leader, said. He said the group was putting off a confrontation with military rulers, and hoped that the US would continue to support the country financially. With the biggest share in the parliament, it is giving confusing and contradictory signals there.
In November, the MB was assuring public that they would challenge the military over its right to continue appointing the prime minister and the cabinet until a constitution is ratified and a president is elected. Weeks later, the great giver of assurance said it would leave the military-appointed government until June. A number of MB leaders said the constitution should be drafted on the military’s preferred timetable, before the election of a president. Till then, the generals will retain control of the government. “We will cooperate with everyone, the people, the Parliament, the cabinet and military council”, Essam el-Erian, a MB leader, said. He said the group was putting off a confrontation with military rulers, and hoped that the US would continue to support the country financially. With the biggest share in the parliament, it is giving confusing and contradictory signals there.
At the same time, MB is standing opposed to the 
people demanding ouster of the generals, who have no mandate. The MB 
prevented hundreds of protesters from reaching parliament on Jan. 31. 
The protesters were demanding the end to military rule. An AFP news 
report quoted an MB member: “We are standing here as a human shield, 
because if the protesters go any further, they will clash with the 
police.” The report quoted an anti military protester: “The Muslim 
Brotherhood youth are blocking all roads to the parliament, preventing 
the anti-military protesters... They are […] standing […] like 
militias.” The march to parliament was called to press the newly-elected
 parliament to implement the goals of the popular upsurge.
Protesters accuse the Islamists colluding with the 
generals: “Badie, you are selling the revolution!” they chanted, in 
reference to Mohammed Badie, the Islamist movement’s supreme guide. On 
the first anniversary of the anti-Mubarak upheaval, political activists 
accused the Muslim Brotherhood of a deep compromise with the generals. 
Their slogans said: “You sold out the revolution.” It is a deal with 
common interest.
While the protesters were calling on the generals to
 quit immediately the MB tried to keep the anniversary demonstration 
upbeat, US press reports said. After getting surrounded by protesters in
 a Cairo demonstration the MB “speakers attempted to join the crowd by 
leading chants of ‘the people want the fall of the regime’ and ‘down 
with military rule’. But the protesters appeared unconvinced. The 
speakers retreated [.…T]he crowd […] began chanting, ‘Get off! Get off!’
 to Brotherhood officials on the stage. Another sound system […] in the 
square boomed: ‘No Brotherhood, no officers! Down, down with military 
rule!’” 
The military
Now, a year after the popular upheaval, Egypt is 
still under martial law. The 19 generals leading back-to-past staggering
 continue cracking down on pro-democracy activists. Thousands of 
democracy activists are being sent before military tribunals and jailed.
 A brutal crackdown left at least 40 demonstrators dead on the eve of 
the first round of parliamentary elections. 
The parliament remains subordinate to the generals. 
Jimmy Carter holds not much hope. After discussions with the generls 
including Field Marshal Tantawi, Carter doubted the general shaaheebs 
would fully submit to the elected authority the rulers with batons had 
promised to install. Armed with all encompassing police power they 
deploy draconian measures to silence critics, ban strikes, and are 
accused of human rights abuses. The generals find foreign interference 
behind demonstrations for democracy. 
The US-dependent generals, part of the ruling 
elites, wore a mask on their face. The smiling sober mask created a 
non-political assumption: they would help install a democratic 
government. Political novices kept their belief: it is a secular shield 
against Islamists. Islamists rightly banked on it to secure their 
dominance. Basing on class allegiance it ultimately secures the Empire’s
 interests in home and in the region as $1.3 billion flows in annually 
in military aid to Cairo from Washington. And, the elites’ alliance 
depends on the Empire’s world system.
The Empire
Reversing its position the US has forged closer ties
 with the Muslim Brotherhood. A complex geo-strategic equation for the 
Empire!
The US financing of NGOs to promote its agenda is an
 old tale. But it took a new turn with the generals’ tactical move. In 
late 2011, an investigation into foreign financing of a number of NGOs, 
and police raids into offices of four NGOs including the International 
Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute that promotes
 US agenda made the scene tricky. US citizens including Sam Lahood, 
local director of the IRI and son of US Transportation Secretary Ray 
LaHood were banned from leaving Egypt. The NDI and IRI activists took 
refuge in the US embassy. The situation enraged a number of Congress 
members and the US State Department. But actually the general’s stroke 
against the NGOs was aimed at Egyptian people, not the Empire. To cast 
away confusion, Egyptian officials went to the US, and met military 
officials and congress members there. 
Not a defeat 
After appeasement and compromises by the same class 
elements, to some, last year’s Egyptian uprising appears a defeat. But 
in a broader socio-historical perspective, it’s not a defeat, rather, 
part of a longer process. Despite prospects of temporary failure, 
initiatives of resistance and rejuvenation are getting organized.
The Egypt Revolutionaries' Alliance demands Tantawi,
 the de facto ruler, and El-Ganzouri, the interim prime minister, to 
step down. The political alliance and students are planning to start 
civil disobedience against military rule on February 11, the one-year 
anniversary of autocrat Mubarak’s ouster.
The ERA, umbrella of over 50 political groups, 
workers and students, has made seven demands. The principal demand is 
the immediate handover of power from the generals to a civilian 
administration in the People's Assembly, the lower house of the 
parliament. Other demands include: Immediate dismantling of the 
incumbent interim government, and appointment of a national salvation 
government, whose members to be selected by the People's Assembly; 
immediate holding of presidential elections; forming an investigation 
committee to investigate all crimes and massacres committed by the 
ruling authorities; establishing “revolutionary tribunals” to try all 
former regime figures found guilty of involvement in crimes committed 
after the January uprising; immediate dismissal of the prosecutor 
general; and purge and overhaul of the Ministry of Interior. In a 
statement, the ERA asserted that civil disobedience “has become a valid 
means for expressing […] demand for the handover of power to a civilian 
administration in light of the recent deterioration of domestic 
circumstances. […The generals have] failed to live up to its promises 
and Egypt continues to suffer a chronic security vacuum.” 
There are other acts of protests by broader populace
 in Egypt that signify journey for democracy by the undaunted Egyptian 
people, which may be long, painstaking and complex with possibilities of
 set backs as there is weakness in grassroots organization. But 
ultimately it will move as the dominating class alliance is failing and 
will fail to fulfill people’s demands that go against the interests of 
the ruling class alliance.