It’s death, death only.
It’s death of about 200 garments workers and others as a building
collapsed in Savar, a Dhaka suburb. It’s exposure of nourishing
indifference to life; it’s revelation of nurturing greed at the cost of
life. So death dominates the Bangladesh April-days of 2013.
Media report: Workers were compelled to enter the
building to resume production in the 4-5 garments factories that the
multi-storied building housed although the building was identified
unsafe and risky a day ago. The unfortunate workers were unwilling to
enter the building. But supervisors forced them with sticks. The
building’s upward raising was unauthorized. Now, it’s “difficult” to
find the party responsible for the incident.
After going through media reports one can’t escape
the feeling of witnessing hapless animals being pushed to a slaughter
house, a feeling of being controlled simply for profit. And, one can’t
escape an image of a cruel, corrupt system.
Media reports unveil a lot: reluctance to consider
human life, zeal for uninterrupted production, patronization of a system
molded for profit, flaunt power that tramples law, corrupt connection
that disregards human life. And, the scene says a reality of greed
driven dominance. And, the scene says helplessness of a broader society
in front of a juggernaut.
Following the incident common people, the silent
majority shall mourn; the dead unfortunates’ relatives shall weep
silently; sane souls shall search psychology of property owning classes.
Then, a silence shall shroud sad memories. And,
moments shall continue ticking until another similar incident resurrects
publicly. This is the prevailing pattern. It’s a pattern of unnatural
death of the weak, of the workers.
One can look at history as one move from these
issues. Pertinently one can search the number of collapse of buildings
constructed by the British raj and the Mughals. One can compare
technology and technical knowledge between the three: the Mughals, the
colonialists, the Savar and similar cases. Even, one can compare the
enforcement of relevant law, styles and levels of monitoring/supervision
of these three. One can ask: Were they, the colonial masters and the
Mughal emperors, less greedy than today’s masters of capital? Were they
more efficient in areas of construction, supervision, enforcement and
governance than the propertied classes of today? What’s and where does
lie the root of better construction, supervision, enforcement of law? Is
it simply reluctance, indifference, inefficiency and corruption that
played role in the collapse of the building? Even, are not there roots
of indifference, inefficiency and corruption if these are the causes
behind the collapse incident? Do these show a segment’s “mental”
capability or incapability?
Answers to these questions will help identify the
problem and rectify measures being followed. Even connections and actors
can be identified. A graver picture can emerge.
A sociologist or a political scientist shall put a
number of questions, and, those are related to people: How long shall
the commoners silently tolerate these collapses and deaths? Is their no
limit to tolerance? What waits if mass tolerance is not unlimited? Is
there any possibility of political expression if the limit of tolerance
is crossed?
Working hands and brains that produce for owners of
capital shall not remain inactive and silent forever. Not only political
and economic misdoings, deaths can also devour a system’s
acceptability. It does not happen instantly. It happens slowly and
silently. But it happens. This pushes mature systems to practice rules
of necessary measures: accountability, enforcement of pronounced
measures. This pushes mature systems even to impose fine on a head
constable or on a member of a royal family for violation of traffic
rule. Only immature systems dream of hiding skeletons in cupboards.
The commoners shall question: Is this the way of
payment for producing surplus value? Have deaths of workers turned the
norm? And, the commoners shall not accept the payment, shall not accept
the norm.
The commoners shall compare the number of unnatural
deaths of commoners and capital owners over the years and shall try to
find out the causes active with the incidents as in their humble life
they also yearn for natural death.
Propaganda tries to manipulate people-mind. But
ultimately it’s reality that teaches, that helps summarize experiences
gathered over a long period. This makes propagandists ultimately fail.
Even charity ultimately does not work. It slows down
expression of discontent for a temporary period. But it has limit.
Otherwise emperors could have escaped rebellions by resorting to
charities. And, death is more powerful than charity.
Working people, how much wretched they may be, don’t
long for unnatural death. Don’t they deserve a natural death? This
question shall haunt all working people as they experience repeated
unnatural deaths of their class members. They shall question the amount
of profit capital requires to survive? And, they shall search answers to
the questions as they find their deaths are repeatedly neither natural
nor dignified.
It’s difficult to ignore working people power. It’s
so difficult that anti-worker forces are compelled to propagate
pro-worker claims.
The Savar worker-deaths shall live as capital’s tomb
of indifference to worker-life and shall remind workers of all
generations the cruel character of capital. It shall remind workers the
state of workers’ life in a society. It’s not a happy situation for
capital as capital can’t escape wrath of labor.
No comments:
Post a Comment