Oakland is going to
observe a general strike on November 2. The strike will be “against the
growing gap between the rich and everybody else,” said the website of
Occupy Oakland. “The whole world is watching Oakland,” OO said in a
statement. “Let’s show [the world] what is possible.” The OO announced
on its website that it is planning a march to the Port of Oakland, the
US’ fifth busiest, to “shut it down.” New agency reported that tens of
thousands of people are expected to participate in the general strike.
It was also reported that organized labor will extend support. These are
signs of growing discontent.
The decision for city-wide general strike was passed
by Occupy Oakland General Assembly by a 96.9% majority. The OO has
urged other groups nationwide to organize similar events.
The OO statement said: “We […] propose that on […]
November 2, 2011, we liberate Oakland and shut down the 1%. We propose a
city wide general strike.” Now, Oakland is getting prepared for a
general strike that in 1946 also observed a general strike
The OO has invited all students to walk out of
school. “Instead of workers going to work […] the people will converge
on downtown Oakland to shut down the city.” The statement said: “All
banks and corporations should close down for the day or we will march on
them.”
The OO has also called on people “for much more.
People who organize out of their neighborhoods, schools, community
organizations, affinity groups, workplaces and families are encouraged
to self organize in a way that allows them to participate in shutting
down the city in whatever manner they are comfortable with and capable
of.” On November 2, marches have been planned at 9 a.m., noon and 5
p.m., so that as many people as possible can participate.
The decision for the general strike came out as a
result of an incident related to Scott Olsen, 24, former Marine and Iraq
War veteran. Olsen sustained a skull fracture after being shot in the
head on October 25 with a police projectile while peacefully
participating in an Occupy Oakland protest. The images of Olsen standing
peacefully in the Oakland protest frontline, next to a Navy vet holding
a “Veterans for Peace” flag, and the images from moments later of Olsen
lying on the ground wounded have shocked all. The atrocity sparked
anger leading to a call for the general strike. Olsen has become a
rallying cry for the USwide Occupy movement.
Olsen served two tours of duty in Iraq before being
discharged in 2010. After leaving the Marines, he was working as a
system administrator for a software firm. He joined the Oakland protests
with members of Iraq Veterans Against the War, a group raising issues
of homelessness and unemployment among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.
“It’s ironic that days after Obama’s announcement of the end of the Iraq
War, Scott faced a veritable war zone in the streets of Oakland […]”,
The IVAW said in a statement.
John Nichols, Washington correspondent for The
Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times writes: “We Are All
Scott Olsen!” was the message of solidarity vigils, rallies and marches
held in cities across the US and around the world in answer to a call
from IVAW and Occupy Oakland for recognizing Olsen. Thousands attended a
candlelight vigil in Oakland. In Las Vegas, an image of Olsen was
projected at the site of the Occupy encampment. In New York, Occupy Wall
Street activist took to the streets chanting “New York is Oakland,
Oakland is New York.” In London, images of Olsen were displayed at
gatherings. The buzz about the wounding of the veteran was everywhere,
and was best summed up by activist protesting at Wisconsin’s state
Capitol with Olsen in February. It read: “He could be any one of us.”
(The Nation, Oct. 28, 2011)
The Oakland Occupy protests that began October 11
have witnessed more than 100 arrests and a violent confrontation last
week between protesters and police. According to press reports, the
conflict came after police dismantled the protesters’ camp for more than
two weeks. Police fired tear gas over a three-hour period clearing out
the camp on October 25.
Only Oakland is not experiencing steps by
authorities. Steps against the protesters are being escalated as people
are protesting in US cities. On October 30, about 30 anti-Wall Street
protesters were arrested in Portland, Ore., after they refused to leave a
park. Later they have been freed. In Nashville, demonstrators raised
slogans in defiance of an official curfew: “Whose plaza? Our plaza.”
State troopers began enforcing the curfew on October 27 night, three
weeks after protests began. In Phoenix, a Councilman suggested charging
demonstrators the costs of the city in overtime for police, and others
since the protests began October 14. The cost was calculated: $204,162.
Probably, it is the fee for protest in a democracy!
The issue of cost is not sarcasm with democratic
rights, but the real face of a democracy that spends trillions of
dollars to help its absolute minority, the finance-elites, and fails to
help the suffering millions, the absolute majority. This has plainly
been told by Monthly Review editor John Bellamy Foster in his speech in
Occupy Eugene rally on October 15, 2011: “US society has become
fundamentally unequal.”
In this society, John B Foster said, “between 1950
and 1970, for every additional dollar made by those in the bottom 90
percent of income earners, those in the top one hundredth of one percent
received $162 dollars. But that was back when things were more equal!
Between 1990 and 2002 for every added dollar made by those in the bottom
90 percent of the population, those in the top one hundredth of one
percent made an additional $18,000. […] In the United States 400
individuals […] own as much wealth as the bottom half of the US
population, some 150 million people. […] The top 1 percent of the
population in the United States owns four times as much financial wealth
(excluding houses) as the bottom 80 percent of the population. […W]e
live in a plutocracy rather than a democracy, where money outvotes
public opinion at every point in the political process. […U]nions are on
the defensive in this country. [T]hey have been smashed by unfair
legislation. [T]hey are struggling to find a way to fight back.
[…E]lementary and secondary education system in the United States is
being privatized and destroyed. […A]ll of this is related to the system
of economic power, to a society that believes in the Wall Street
principle, “greed is good,” the signature of capitalism.” (“Why We
Occupy, What We Know”)
The worldwide monopoly-finance capital’s tricks are
many, and it has to depend on its political machine. Attempts are made
to avoid public scrutiny, which expose the real face of democracy and
accountability. Actual amount of bail out is much more than the widely
cited amount. Citing an audit by the US General Accounting Office, John
Bellamy Foster said, the Fed provided more than $16 trillion in
financial assistance in the latest financial crisis to the largest
corporations in the US and the world. “The rich were bailed out while
the majority of the population was made to pay the cost! And we are
still paying!”, he said.
The present financial crisis that has built up the
background of today’s occupy movement should be understood in proper
perspective. The crisis has not cropped up from housing bubble, etc.
that are widely being mentioned. Rather it is a terminal stagnation in
the economy that Paul Sweezy and his fellow-travelers told decades back.
Pointing out this Foster said: “[T]here is no real economic recovery;
[…] we are in a period of economic stagnation, where only the rich are
prospering. That economic growth in the United States has been slowing
down in each successive decade since the 1960s and is now virtually
stagnant.”
Today’s worldwide movement has the painful
experience of blood and tears, an inevitable output of imperialism. The
Monthly Review editor said: “United States and its allies have been
engaged recently in wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. […A]n
intervention is being planned for Iran, and possibly Venezuela. […US]
military bases dot the entire globe and are increasing in numbers. […US]
spends around a half a billion dollars officially on the military each
year, and in reality a trillion dollars a year.”
Today’s worldwide Occupy Movement is historically
significant in this world of seven billion people. “We know that we are
the necessary, last defense of humanity. That we are the world’s 99%.
That we will not ‘thin out’ when the weather gets bad. That we are not a
mob. That we are the earth, we are democracy, we are the future. The
world has been occupied too long by a tiny minority. It is time for the
people to reoccupy it. To take it back”, Foster said. [Emphasis added.]
Resistance and revolts in societies have respective
trajectories determined by historical and socioeconomic condition. “[…A]
Great Revolt from Below was likely in the United States today, given a
deep and lasting economic stagnation. But that we might have to wait
three or four years, just as in the great depression, for it to get off
the ground, and for the people to ignite. That, just as in the Great
Depression, the revolt would not materialize until people had learned
that the promise of economic recovery was false, that they had been lied
to and systematically robbed. Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Eugene, Occupy
the United States is the Great Revolt from Below in our time. […]
Everywhere people are uniting in struggle”, said the Monthly Review
editor.
Today’s movement in the US is significant. “The
reason is that we in the United States live in ‘Fortress America’, the
heart of a world empire. Revolts are not supposed to happen here! If a
break in the wall appears, if massive protests occur, here, ‘Inside the
Monster’, as José Martí called it, the whole world is suddenly uplifted
and encouraged to resist. Because then they know that the empire is
crumbling. Our struggles here are opening up space for resistance for
all the people of the world”, John Belly Foster said.
But, it should not be expected that these public
protests and the general strike are the US’ Tahrir Time. Still a
critical mass of labor, and, broadly, people are in the waiting. Without
their active participation the Tahrir Time will not touch ground. A
general strike, part of democracy people can practice, turns political,
broadly and specifically. A general strike for political rights, and
based on democratic principles trains people with politics. It
facilitates activate passive part of populace, and raises essential and
functional political questions, which are essential parts to move
forward. The plebeians’ general strikes, secessio plebis, ultimately
made the patrician creditors bow down – adoptions of the Twelve Tables
and the Lex Hortensia. But, it took more than two hundred years in Rome.
No comments:
Post a Comment